1
0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2025-04-15 03:55:47 +00:00
Jeff King 7c81040792 patch-ids: refuse to compute patch-id for merge commit
The patch-id code which powers "log --cherry-pick" doesn't
look at whether each commit is a merge or not. It just feeds
the commit's first parent to the diff, and ignores any
additional parents.

In theory, this might be useful if you wanted to find
equivalence between, say, a merge commit and a squash-merge
that does the same thing.  But it also promotes a false
equivalence between distinct merges. For example, every
"merge -s ours" would look identical to an empty commit
(which is true in a sense, but presumably there was a value
in merging in the discarded history). Since patch-ids are
meant for throwing away duplicates, we should err on the
side of _not_ matching such merges.

Moreover, we may spend a lot of extra time computing these
merge diffs. In the case that inspired this patch, a "git
format-patch --cherry-pick" dropped from over 3 minutes to
less than 3 seconds.

This seems pretty drastic, but is easily explained. The
command was invoked by a "git rebase" of an older topic
branch; there had been tens of thousands of commits on the
upstream branch in the meantime. In addition, this project
used a topic-branch workflow with occasional "back-merges"
from "master" to each topic (to resolve conflicts on the
topics rather than in the merge commits). So there were not
only extra merges, but the diffs for these back-merges were
generally quite large (because they represented _everything_
that had been merged to master since the topic branched).

This patch treats a merge fed to commit_patch_id() or
add_commit_patch_id() as an error, and a lookup for such a
merge via has_commit_patch_id() will always return NULL.
An earlier version of the patch tried to distinguish between
"error" and "patch id for merges not defined", but that
becomes unnecessarily complicated. The only callers are:

  1. revision traversals which want to do --cherry-pick;
     they call add_commit_patch_id(), but do not care if it
     fails. They only want to add what we can, look it up
     later with has_commit_patch_id(), and err on the side
     of not-matching.

  2. format-patch --base, which calls commit_patch_id().
     This _does_ notice errors, but should never feed a
     merge in the first place (and if it were to do so
     accidentally, then this patch is a strict improvement;
     we notice the bug rather than generating a bogus
     patch-id).

So in both cases, this does the right thing.

Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-12 13:45:01 -07:00
2016-08-31 10:03:50 -07:00
2016-09-02 09:05:47 -07:00
2016-07-25 14:13:33 -07:00
2016-08-31 10:03:50 -07:00
2016-07-19 13:22:22 -07:00
2016-08-12 09:47:36 -07:00
2016-07-11 10:31:05 -07:00
2016-07-19 13:22:16 -07:00
2016-08-12 09:47:37 -07:00
2016-08-19 15:34:14 -07:00
2016-08-19 15:34:14 -07:00
2016-07-20 12:11:09 -07:00
2016-07-20 12:11:09 -07:00
2016-07-27 14:15:51 -07:00
2016-08-12 09:47:39 -07:00
2016-07-25 14:13:32 -07:00
2016-07-19 13:22:19 -07:00
2016-07-01 12:44:57 -07:00
2016-07-01 12:44:57 -07:00
2016-08-11 14:35:42 -07:00
2016-09-02 09:05:47 -07:00
2016-07-01 15:09:10 -07:00
2016-07-19 13:22:15 -07:00
2016-06-28 11:39:02 -07:00
2016-08-08 14:48:41 -07:00
2016-07-06 13:38:06 -07:00
2016-07-19 13:22:16 -07:00
2016-05-17 14:38:32 -07:00
2016-08-17 14:07:47 -07:00
2016-05-17 14:38:28 -07:00
2016-07-29 11:05:07 -07:00
2016-07-29 11:05:07 -07:00
2016-07-29 11:05:06 -07:00
2016-08-19 15:34:16 -07:00
2016-07-28 11:26:03 -07:00
2016-07-28 11:26:03 -07:00
2016-07-25 14:13:33 -07:00
2016-07-28 11:28:32 -07:00
2016-05-23 14:54:38 -07:00
2016-08-12 09:47:39 -07:00
2016-08-19 15:34:16 -07:00
2016-07-14 15:50:41 -07:00
2016-08-24 08:41:22 -07:00
2016-08-12 09:47:37 -07:00
2016-07-01 15:09:10 -07:00
2016-07-19 13:22:16 -07:00
2016-08-05 09:28:17 -07:00
2016-07-26 11:13:44 -07:00
2016-08-11 14:35:42 -07:00
2016-07-14 15:50:41 -07:00
2016-08-11 14:35:42 -07:00
2016-07-28 10:34:42 -07:00

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from http://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
Git Source Code Mirror - This is a publish-only repository but pull requests can be turned into patches to the mailing list via GitGitGadget (https://gitgitgadget.github.io/). Please follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches procedure for any of your improvements.
Readme 829 MiB
Languages
C 50.1%
Shell 38.4%
Perl 5.1%
Tcl 3.2%
Python 0.8%
Other 2.1%